Excessive Investment Fees: Is Your Portfolio Being Feasted Upon?

Wolves of Wall Street
Investing
4

One of the most entertaining scenes in the movie ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ is when Mark Hanna (played by Matthew McConaughey) explains to new recruit Jordan Belford (Leonardo DiCaprio) how stockbroking business works over lunch of martini and cocaine.

“F*** the clients. Your only responsibility is to put meat on the table. The name of the game is to move your client’s money into your pocket.”

“But if you can make the client some money it’s advantageous to everyone, correct?” Belford replied.

“No,” Hanna quickly answered.

“Number one rule of Wall Street: Nobody, I don’t care if you’re Warren Buffett or Jimmy Buffett, NOBODY KNOWS if a stock is going to go up, down, sideways or in circles, least of all stockbrokers… It’s all a fugazi— It’s fake,” Hanna explained.

“Clients are addicted to trading, and the challenge for the broker is to keep coming up with brilliant ideas to keep them trading again, again and again.”

“The client thinks he is getting rich, but in fact, it’s the broker who’s taking home the cold hard cash via commissions,” Hanna added, smiling profusely.

Hanna explains to Belford how stockbroking works
Mark Hanna explains to newbie, Jordan Belford, how stockbroking works

Of course, this is Hollywood’s depiction of how Wall Street works— it was designed to sell tickets.

But what many investors don’t realize is that what was depicted in the movie is frighteningly close to reality. Unscrupulous salespersons, brokers, and investment advisors could be feasting on their portfolios in the form of high fees and commissions.

Related: How to Ruin your Investment Portfolio (Part I: Day Trading)

And we’re not only talking about individual stocks. A typical retirement portfolio comprising of mutual funds could also be subjected to high costs— potentially eating your returns.

The impact of high fees and commissions

Belford may have gotten a free lunch at the Windows of the World restaurant from his boss. But as with anything else you buy, there are fees and costs associated with investment products and services.

Assuming an investor put $100,000 into a stock mutual fund 20 years ago. The fund earned an average annual return of 8 percent. Today, the account should have grown to $424,785— if it were purchased directly from the fund company, on a no-load basis, with a minimal 0.5 percent annual fee.

However, your investment adviser can sell you the same exact fund with a different fee structure, in the form of mutual fund classes, which they can use to their advantage.

Same fund with different fee structure

If an “adviser” sold the same investor the Class C shares that don’t have an up-front fee but charges a much larger annual fee of 1.8 percent— along with potential “back-end” fees (if you sell within one year), the investor would have gotten a really ugly deal.

The result would be a portfolio with an ending balance of only $333,035— a $91,750 difference!

Now imagine the impact these fees would have on a million dollar portfolio.

How to control investment costs

Don’t get me wrong. Investment fees and commissions aren’t all bad. Wolves need to eat too. You just want to make sure you’re getting good value from your investment without letting them feast on your returns.

Good value means you are getting your money’s worth via the fund’s performance relative to the benchmark.

Understand the fees before you invest

Review the rules and read the investment prospectus. Be sure to ask about all fees— they add up very quickly.

  • Trading fee ($4 to $9 are common)
  • Expense ratios of mutual funds (0.04% or less to 1.5% or more)
  • Sales charges: Front or Back-End Load (1% to 5.75%)
  • Marketing or distribution 12-b1 fees (0.25% to 1%)
  • Administration fees (very common for 401K and self-directed IRA)
  • Assets Under Management fees (industry average is 1.67%)

Most of these fees can be avoided or minimized. You can avoid sales charges by sticking to no-load mutual funds, for example.

As a DIY investor, I don’t pay A.U.M. fees. If you do need professional help, I’d suggest you seek a Fee-only Investment Advisor who has a fiduciary duty to act in their clients’ best interest. They do not accept any fees or compensation based on product sales. 

Low-cost index funds are your best friends

Index funds have a much lower cost because there’s no need for human oversight— they track a market index like the S&P 500 as the benchmark. Hiring and firing fund managers can be expensive.

Vanguard index funds, in particular, have low fees because it has no outside investors— the company is owned by its fund. The expense ratio of the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSAX) is only 0.04%, for example.

Time and time again, most actively managed funds fail to beat their benchmarks. Finding an actively managed mutual fund that can consistently beat the market over a long period of time is like finding a needle in a haystack.

Foreign stock funds and bond funds could be the exception. So I wouldn’t dismiss actively managed funds altogether.

Mmm.. Delicious 5% sales charge!

Avoid active trading

The reason active investors lose money is that they’re not really investors— they’re speculators. Like gambling, frequent trading can be addictive. Trying to beat the market by picking individual stocks, day trading, or timing the market are all recipes for failure.

Think twice before investing in individual stocks. To be successful requires skill, upfront, and regular research. They can also be extremely costly and difficult to manage on your own.

It’s no secret brokerage firms love active traders. Even at low commission rates, investment firms make billions in trading fees. Trade only when it makes sense for your portfolio.

Be wary of experts offering advice. Remember, a blindfolded monkey throwing darts at a newspaper’s financial pages can pick stocks just as well as the “experts”— at least according to famous economist Burton Malkiel.

So never ever join subscription-based investment clubs that provide stock recommendations based on stupid technical analysis or price targets.

I reviewed my investment portfolio and discovered that I’ve been paying over 1% expense ratio in 3 funds in my 403B!! I immediately reallocated two of them to a low-cost American large-cap fund. Thanks for raising awareness.

You are welcome. Funds overall have lower expense ratios compared to a decade ago; thanks to Vanguard. Over 1% is indeed very expensive.

Hi there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell
you I genuinely enjoy reading through your articles.
Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics?
Thanks!

This is a very good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere.
Simple but very accurate information… Appreciate your sharing this one.
A must read article!

4 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Investing
War is Stupid, So is Panic Selling

Russia has invaded Ukraine, another black swan event to wreak havoc in the stock market just when the world has barely recovered from the effects of COVID-19. Putin must have lost his mind— a scary proposition considering that Russia has the most nukes in its arsenal. What’s next? The Chinese …

Calculating Warren Buffett's Rate of Return
Investing
Calculating Warren Buffett’s Rate of Return (and what you can learn from it)

In a 2018 Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting, Warren Buffett stated that if someone invested $10,000 in a stock index fund back in 1942, it would have been worth $51 million. An index fund is a type of mutual fund designed to match the performance of the overall market. For …

Books
Impact Investing: the Economy is Moving Away From Profit and Toward Purpose

In life, there are two main ways you can achieve financial freedom: you could get rich at all costs and not care about anything else, which could also put you in trouble and make enemies along the way, or you could become a conscious investor with a purpose. The first …

%d bloggers like this: