Friday, April 14, 2017

What if you didn't have to pay taxes?

"None of us want to pay taxes again, ever."-- this was last of the many demands Harry Stamper (played by Bruce Willis) and the rest of his oil-drilling crew had against the U.S. federal government in the movie Armageddon.


The 1998 science-fiction film was about a giant asteroid whose collision course will crash the Earth. The scientists at NASA plan to detonate a nuclear bomb, which must be buried 800 feet under the asteroid's surface in order to break it apart, causing it to miss the collision with the Earth.

The government officials had no choice but to agree to their demands. He's the best oil driller on the planet. They simply don't want to take any chances.

As incredibly risky the job is, it's nevertheless one of the sweetest deal one could ever wish for: a chance to ride a shuttle to get into space, become an international hero by saving the planet, and if they happen to survive, not pay any taxes for the rest of their lives!!!

Be careful what you wish for

Do you find yourself constantly daydreaming of not paying taxes? Be careful what you wish for when you rub that magic lamp.

Or you might end up like the 60 year old husband who instantly turned 90 after wishing for a much younger wife!

According to the Tax Policy Center (TPC), a D.C.-based firm that provides tax research and estimates, 44.5% of American households will pay zero or negative federal income tax --- roughly 76.6 million households -- for the 2016 calendar year.

Roughly half of this number pay no income tax because they have no taxable income. The not so recent news about Trump's tax returns or billionaire practice of paying themselves $1 probably comes into your mind, but they are just a drop in the bucket.

They are mostly comprised of low-income households that do not pay federal income taxes. Their incomes are lower than the combination of their allowed standard deduction and exemptions, or because they receive tax credits.

Worst comes to worst, the genie might end up magically causing your present and prospective employers lay you off permanently. In this way, you don't have to pay taxes again, ever (not even sales tax because you'd be dirt poor).

Aim to minimize taxes instead

When I say aim to minimize taxes, I didn't mean that you should aim to get a bigger tax refund. A sizable tax refund only means that you're loaning the government money for free.

If so, file a new W-4 form with your employer. Try this IRS withholding calculator directly from the agency itself.

15 years ago, I started preparing my own taxes. That was the last time that I aimed for a big tax refund. I got audited by the IRS instead. I was young, dumb and stupid. Now I use TurboTax and you should too. Always, I'll say it again, always use reliable software when filing your taxes.

Be honest with your taxes. You need to obey the taxing authority. Don't be a crook. Crooks don't get rich. Maybe sometimes they do, but they don't stay wealthy. People eventually discover that they are crooks and start not to trust 'em. That's the start of their downfall.

Minimize income taxes

Your most powerful wealth-building arsenal is your income. I know he's our uncle, but don't let Sam grab a bigger slice of your earnings pie.

The following are very basic general information but I couldn't emphasize more, tax planning is very important to conserve wealth. You need to avoid unnecessary taxes.

Lower your taxable income

Money contributed to an employer-sponsored retirement plan, such as a traditional 401(K) or Canadian RRSP is not included in your taxable income. For the former, you can contribute up to $18,000 or $24,000 if you're 50 years old or older.

If you don't have an employer-sponsored plan, you can open a traditional IRA account and contribute up to a maximum of $5,500 this year ($6,500 if you're 50 or older).

ROTH 401K or ROTH IRAs don't have this upfront tax break because withdrawals are tax-free in retirement.

Maximize your deductions

Many of your everyday expenses can be itemized as deductions on your income tax return, saving you lots of money at tax time. However, unless you have a large amount of qualifying expenses, you might be better off taking the standard deduction, as most taxpayers do. Since you can decide every year whether you want to take the standard deduction or not, careful tax planning can help you maximize your deductions in years you itemize.

Should you decide to itemize here's some information on how to maximize them, courtesy of TurboTax

Be charitable

It also pays to be charitable. Donations to charity are tax deductible expenses and can reduce your taxable income. Here you can find information about charitable contribution deductions.

Minimize investment taxes

Choose the right bucket to hold your investments

Use tax-sheltered accounts such as IRAs and workplace retirement plans for individual stocks you plan to hold for less than one year or actively managed funds that generate short-term capital gains. Taxable bonds and funds that invest in these types of bonds.

Taxable brokerage accounts are suitable for tax-free municipal bonds for obvious reasons. I'd also hold non-dividend paying speculative stocks in it. In this way, you can take advantage of tax-loss harvesting strategy, which you simply cannot do on a tax-sheltered account.

Avoid high-turnover funds or stick to index funds

Turnover means transactions, and transactions are taxable events. Unlike actively managed funds, index funds only turn over their portfolios when the companies that comprise their indexes change.

In the case of the S&P 500, a very small percentage of the companies that belong to the index changes each year. This results in a very low turnover rate that translates to almost no capital gains tax.

Invest for the long haul, get long-term capital gains rate

A long-term capital gain or loss applies to certain investments that were owned for longer than 12 months before it was sold. Long-term capital gains are assigned a lower tax rate than short-term capital gains.

I don't consider my home as an investment, but if you recently sold your home, be aware that you may exclude up to $250,000 gain ($500,000 if married filing jointly) if you stayed in it for at least 2 of the last 5 years before the date of sale. In most cases, that's zero capital gains tax!

Tax-loss harvesting

Do you have an investment that is losing capital? Selling these securities at a loss can offset capital gains tax liability. Of course, I prefer that you do not lose investment capital at all. Hold speculative individual stock investments in a taxable brokerage account.

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Why I'm switching to an HSA account

Do you know what's the biggest expense that you will incur in your lifetime?

Nope. It's not your home.

I remember my hands were shaking when I handed my agent a $43,000 cashier's check as down payment for our house, 13 years ago. But like I said, it's not the house. Not even close.

Our modest house being built in 2004, isn't she pretty?

Your house may very well be your single biggest purchase, but it's not the biggest expense that you will INCUR IN YOUR LIFETIME.

Guess again...

Nope. It's not cable (geez.. Are you really spending that much on entertainment?).

Here's a clue:

You guessed it right this time. It's TAXES!

Of course, this largely depends upon your tax rate. With a progressive tax system, the higher your income, the higher taxes are imposed. Here's a link to 2017 tax brackets courtesy of Bankrate.

Assuming you're in the 25% tax bracket, like my wife and I filing jointly do, you might be looking at paying a million-dollar tax bill over the course of your lifetime. And this doesn't include sales and property taxes.

Now, how about the second biggest expense ???

Stop bringing up the house again.

Try again...

Nope. It's not your car, unless you're driving a really fancy one like this Lamborghini.

Student loans? Nope, unless you're a broke doctor or a lawyer.

Here's another clue:

You are absolutely correct. It's HEALTHCARE!

According to a 2010 Prudential study, a typical 65yo married couple free of chronic disease, can expect to spend $197,000 on remaining lifetime health care costs-- excluding nursing home care and there is 5% probability that these costs will exceed $311,000.

Note that these numbers don't include expenses that you have already incurred on healthcare before age 65!

So it's TAXES and HEALTHCARE-- two of the biggest expenditures that we will incur in our lifetime.

Wouldn't it be great to be able to save money on both?

Health Savings Account (HSA) to the rescue

A health savings account is a tax-advantaged plan that is available to people with a high-deductible health insurance. The idea is that when people use their own savings for healthcare, they are likely to shop around for the best deal, which helps control health care costs.

Although HSAs have been around for more than 13 years, it was only a couple of years ago when it was actually offered by my company's healthcare plan. Even then, I didn't pay much attention to it because I'm already maxing out my ROTH IRA in addition to my company-sponsored retirement plan.

This year, I decided to switch. This is because my employer appears to be in the process of getting-rid of the 401(K) company match. I figured that since I am likely to spend a ton of money on healthcare when I get old anyway, why not max-out my HSA contributions first?

By maximizing the tax savings, I will, in effect, free up more resources for other expenditures like home renovations, vacations, and other fun stuff in retirement.

Note that this plan is not for everyone. It is particularly beneficial for people who are savers and are in excellent health condition like me.

Together, all the way. (image courtesy of Cigna)

Awesome Tax Advantages

With an HSA, you can contribute pre-tax money, just like a 401(K) or Canadian RRSP up to a pre-defined contribution limit. In 2017, the annual HSA contribution limit for individuals is $3,400 and $6,750 for families.

You can then use the money saved in your HSA self-directed investment account to buy individual stocks, mutual funds or ETFs (much to your heart's content) and your earnings will be TAX-FREE as long as you use them for qualified expenses.

There is also no Required Minimum Distribution-- You are not forced to take money out of them, which can potentially bump you up to a higher tax bracket.

In other words, an HSA account combines the TAX-DEFERRED feature of a 401(K) or RRSP, and the TAX-FREE and No RMD aspects of a ROTH-IRA, provided that you use them for qualified medical expenses, which you will surely incur anyway!

Eligible medical expenses may include things like contact lenses, dental treatments, insurance premiums, long-term care, and laboratory fees.

I don't believe that Obamacare is that broken to be repealed. But it's a shame that President Trump wasn't able to negotiate a deal with democrats last week to pass the American Health Care Act into fruition. The proposed bill would have expanded the HSA by increasing the contribution limits and lowering the percentage of the tax on distributions that are not used for qualified expenses.

Here's how I plan to use it

A little known feature is that you're allowed to pull out and reimburse yourself for past eligible expenses AT ANY TIME--- as long as you keep the receipts.

For example, instead of withdrawing money from the HSA account to cover things like routine dental treatments or medical check-ups, I can pay for these out-of-pocket. In this way, the money invested in the account can continue to grow and compound-- tax-free.

Later down the road, say in 20 years, I can reimburse myself for these expenses and use the money for paying non-eligible expenses that would have been taxable otherwise. That $1,000 that you didn't take out, 20 years ago, would have grown to maybe $10,000, depending on how it is invested.

By doing this, you'll have more money to spend for major expenses such as long-term care or heaven forbid, open-heart surgery.

May you stay healthy.

Monday, March 6, 2017

Aw, Snap! (I should not have bought the stock)

Buy what you know, and stick to companies with good long-term
prospects and quality management-- are 3 well-known rules that the famous investor, Warren Buffett, follow when buying stocks.

None of these rules I followed when I bought 200 shares of SNAP when it went public last week.

The purchase was done on impulse. Risky move indeed, but it is risk that I can afford to take.

I bought what I barely knew

I sort of knew what SNAP is. It is the parent company of Snapchat-- famous for its disappearing messages. Across the country, millions of teenagers and millennials have been using the app to share intimate and sometimes indecent selfies. It's the killer app that could have saved Anthony Weiner's career-- if only he knew about it.

I'm no active Snapchat user, but I do try to login to my account (I go by the username of M Solve) every now and then. The only reason why I have yet to send a message is because I don't know anyone there. Most of my friends are either on Facebook or Instagram.

Being an older Generation X'er, I simply don't belong to the age group (I still do get a lot of compliments that I look very young for my age though).

What's interesting for me is that the company's 26 year old co-founder and the CTO, Bobby Murphy, is part Filipino. He's now worth a cool $5.6 billion dollars. His mother grew up in the Philippines before emigrating to the USA. This is probably what intrigued my interest to watch the stock.

Valuation, what valuation?

Everybody knows that buying stocks is the same as buying a piece of a business. When you're buying the coffee shop across the street, the first thing that you ask is "What's the bottom line?". Let's say the store's net profit is $10,000 per year, after all the employee salaries and other expenses are paid. If the owner is selling the business at $100,000, the Price-Earnings (or the P/E ratio) is 10.

The P/E ratio is probably the most important metric that professionals use (and misuse) when buying or selling stocks. In general, a low P/E can indicate that the company may currently be undervalued. Either that or the company is doing very well relative to its past trends.

In the case of Snap, there is no P/E ratio...

Companies that are losing money do not have a P/E ratio.

In fact, the company has incurred a net lost of $514.6 million in 2016 and $306.6 million in 2015, according to its SEC filing in February.

An alternative would be to use the Price-Sales metric by using revenues instead of earnings. But even then, valuation in Snap's case is not relevant, according to the "Mad Money" host, Jim Cramer. You simply cannot value the stock when only 200 million out of the 1.2 billion shares are publicly traded.

What's pushing the price is the stock's "hotness" factor.

Why then did I buy the stock?

It's pure speculation, I do not plan to hold the stock for a long time.

I seldom buy individual stocks, it's risky. The ones that I'm currently holding, I've held for a very long time. I'm fortunate that I've profited from them, through dividends and asset appreciation.

Snap will be the exception to the rule. For growth stocks like Snap, expect potential dividend money to be reinvested back to the business. Capital appreciation is what I'm hoping to get.

You see, there's nothing wrong with doing a little speculation ;)

I bought the stock with money that I can afford to lose.

$5,000 is money that I can afford to lose. That's the most that I could lose, but the probability that I'd lose all that in a year or two is close to nil.

I figured that if the stock loses 2/3 of its value then that will be comparable to me spending $3,348 to travel to Manila to attend my high school reunion. And since I didn't actually go, any loss that I might incur due to this trade will still be within my budget.

Let's wait and see.

Monday, February 20, 2017

What 20 years in America has taught me about money

Today is my 20th year anniversary living in America-- the land of milk and honey. The place where pretty much anything that I'm accustomed to seeing is bigger. Bigger houses, bigger cars, bigger TVs., bigger you name it.

I can vividly remember what my reaction was the first time I was handed a bucket of popcorn in a movie theater. "Do you expect me to eat all that?" was written all over my face. Suddenly, it finally made sense why most Americans are bigger than me.

It was 1997 and companies in the United States were hiring like crazy in preparation for the Y2K problem, otherwise known as the Millennium bug. Problems arose because programs were designed to store only the last 2 digits of the year to save computer memory and this made 2000 indistinguishable from 1900. It didn't take a long time for me, a natural geek (I've been writing code since age 12), to get hired as a computer programmer.

I grew up in the Philippines, a country with a colorful history. At one point, it was regarded as the second wealthiest in East Asia, next only to Japan. But the economy stagnated in the mid 60s when the late dictator, President Marcos and his wife Imelda (infamous for her 3,000 pairs of shoes), started using the country's Central Bank as their personal ATM machine.

I came from a well-to-do family, but a great number of people in Manila, the city where I came from, were living in poverty. This was a sharp contrast to the booming economy of the U.S., where the majority is the middle class.

Eventually, I became a proud American citizen. I'm very grateful for the opportunities that were given to me. Now, I can honestly say that I love this country probably more than some of her natural-born citizens.

I'm also thankful for the money lessons that I learned along the way...


When I ask a fellow Pinoy (informal term for Filipino) to meet somewhere at a specific time, a common follow-up question that I get is for qualification whether I meant Filipino or American time.
Filipino time meant I'm coming 15 to 30 minutes late.

You see, Filipinos are notoriously known for being late. One theory that I read is that this is embedded in the culture as it's generally considered 'unethical' to arrive at a party early as you don't want to be perceived as greedy-- that you want to get all the food for yourself.

On the other hand, "American time" meant arriving at a precise time. This probably started when the United States and Canadian railroads instituted a standard time in time zones.  Before then, time of day was a local matter and may vary from city to city. It became very important to arrive at the station at the exact same time in order to not miss your train ride.

In fact, one of the most fascinating things that I've read over the web about American time is that it's not worth Bill Gates' time, the richest man in the world, to pick up a dropped $100 bill from the ground because he's making much more than that per second that he is alive.

I also learned that not investing early will cost you. Given two people of the same age who both plan to retire at age 60. The person who started investing at a late age of 35 will have to contribute twice as much on a monthly basis until retirement in order to accumulate the same amount of savings as the person who started at age 25.

From time to time, I still arrive in meetings a bit late. But I learned not to procrastinate. Whether it's paying the bills, filing my taxes, or rebalancing my portfolio, I make sure that I complete them consistently ahead of time.

It took five years after I moved to America that I started to understand and appreciate the time value of money. I sort of regret not investing in my 20s. But it is certainly a lot better than not starting at all.


You've heard the mantra many times: "Don't put your eggs in one basket!". Of course, I knew about this even before I migrated to America. But because I'm Filipino the phrase has a different twist,

"Don't put all your baluts in one basket."

For those who never heard of it, a balut looks like a regular egg that you buy from the grocery store except that it is an actual developing bird embryo (usually a duck or a chicken). It's a common food in countries in Southeast Asia and is considered as a favorite delicacy of many Filipinos.

Eating the thing has been featured many times in the popular stunt game show-- Fear Factor.
I personally find it funny to see how scared the contestants are eating this Filipino delicacy when I myself can eat 5 of those in one sitting especially when they're still warm.

It's all mind over matter. But I also know that it's easier said than done. Case in point, I heard from my wife that some people in Texas eat cows' balls-- I have to admit, that is something that I cannot stomach.

Going back to investing, diversification essentially means investing in a mix of asset classes to ensure you are not in serious trouble even if you lost a significant amount of money on one of your investments. This is because any losses, incurred on any of your investments, may be offset by gains earned by other assets.

Whereas there weren't many options in the Philippines when I was living there, the vast number of investment options in the United States made it possible for me to diversify my investments.


As a 13 year old high-school student in the Philippines, my economics teacher required us to open a savings account at a local bank. Our grades at the end of each period would be partly based on the interest that we earned and how frequently we went to the bank to save some money.

In an effort, to obtain the highest mark possible, I remember going to the bank to deposit a measly sum of 3 to 5 pesos (sometimes in really small denominations, to the ire of bank tellers), every first day of the week for the span of one year.

At that young age, I knew that my money was earning interest, no matter how small. I even knew the difference between simple and compound interest. But it was only when I moved to America, after I started saving and investing in stocks for the long term, did I realize how fast my balance could possibly grow (especially when the dividends are reinvested).

For example, it took my retirement balance 7 years to reach the $100,000 mark, but it took only a little over 2 years for it to double to $200,000.

The fact that you'll end up more than $7,000,000 ahead when you doubled a penny every day for 30 days as compared to when you're given a flat $100,000 each day for the same period is simply amazing.

It's no surprise this mathematical phenomenon is always referred to as the 8th wonder of the world.


When it comes to sports, Filipinos are known to be passionate about boxing. Hence, the rise of the current record holder, eight-division boxing world champion, Philippine Senator Manny Pacquiao. At one point, he was the second highest-paid athlete in the world second only to his arch-nemesis Floyd "Money" Mayweather, an undefeated American fighter considered by many as the best defensive fighter that the sport has ever seen.

The 2015 fight was billed as "The Fight of the Century". The fight was televised through pay-per-view (PPV) and was jointly produced by HBO and Showtime. Win or lose, both fighters received the highest purse of their life (the single biggest payday in the history of sports). This is in part because of the great amount of risk either party will supposedly experience when facing each other in the ring...

The greater the risk, the higher the reward.

The fight turned out to be a big disappointment because Mayweather spent most of his time dancing in circles around the Filipino boxer instead of fighting.  In spite of this, Pacquiao earned over $100,000,000 fighting Mayweather, who probably earned twice as much. 

Compare that number to the relatively small $4,000,000 base purse that Pacquiao earned fighting a lesser-known Mexican boxing champion, Jessie Vargas, last fall (I and a couple of friends personally flew to Vegas to watch the fight)...

The lesser the risk, the lower the reward.

When it comes to investing, investors can control or minimize the risk in their portfolio by a proper mix of stocks, bonds or cash. Most experts consider a portfolio more heavily weighted toward stocks riskier than a portfolio that favors bonds. Stocks are more suitable for someone with a higher risk tolerance, whereas bonds will be more appropriate for those that can't afford the risk.

Should you invest majority of your retirement savings in bonds because it's less risky? The answer is a big NO, unless you're retiring next month. On average, S&P 500 has returned about 12% since 1982. You're lucky if you get half of that investing in bonds.

Investing in a diversified portfolio of stocks for the long-term is the best way to combat inflation, which is likely to erode your returns otherwise. Using the boxing analogy above, it's better that you face a riskier Mayweather because of the higher rewards (not to mention that you get to punch him in the face).

American innovation played a major role in providing the advanced tools needed to manage the risk and maximize the rewards of your portfolio. I myself, as well as other immigrants from around the world who worked for fintech companies, have contributed our share towards the advancement of the technology-- in our own little way.

I'm looking forward to learning more lessons in the years to come.

[See also]
Living the American Dream - The Friendly Russian

Monday, February 13, 2017

Your spouse will have the greatest impact to your financial well-being

With Valentine's Day just a couple of days away, I'm beginning to feel the pressure to come up with something really special for my wife. Traditionally, it would be fresh flowers-- a bouquet of red roses to be specific.

In the past, I hated buying flowers. I've always thought of it as a big waste of money. So to minimize the cost, I bought them at Walmart. If you're as frugal as I was, just don't tell her where you are buying it from, or it will quickly lose its luster.

In fact, when my wife and I started dating I bought her fake porcelain flowers reasoning that they can last forever. The idea that one would spend $50 on a rose bouquet that won't last more than a few days is beyond me.

For single lads out there, I'm now convinced that the bouquet of flowers that you buy on Valentine's Day may very well be one of the best investments that you're going to make (next to an engagement ring)... IF AND ONLY IF, you are giving it to the right woman.

Unless of course, your only intention is to get laid.

For single ladies out there, be aware that accepting a bouquet of flowers from someone you like may become a prelude to a romantic engagement that more often than not lead to an actual marriage. And that's the scary part.

For both parties, be forewarned...


This is an obvious point for gold diggers. But I'm not talking about marrying for money. I'm talking from the point of view of an investor. If you're looking to marry someday, the most important thing that you can do is to pick your spouse carefully.

Happy Valentine's Day.

This is an actual picture of the rose that I gave my wife last year.

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The real cost of buying that 65" TV

My wife posing at the Jersey shore.

Earlier this morning, I've sold a mutual fund that I held for 15 long years-- Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™ (ticker symbol SWOIX). As the name suggests, the fund invests in shares of companies outside the United States. It falls under Morningstar's "Foreign Large Growth" category because the fund manager's focus is on the stocks' long-term growth prospects as opposed to their valuation.

I bought the shares in 2002 for $1,699. I no longer have a copy of the trade confirmation because 15 years is obviously a very long time, but I do remember the exact amount. This is because it was one of my first mutual fund purchases outside a company-sponsored 401K retirement plan. I had to roll-over a measly balance of about $5,000 to a traditional IRA account. I then split the amount evenly to buy shares of 3 mutual funds for $1,699 each.

I finally decided to sell the fund in favor of another because of the following reasons:
  • 15 year average annual return of 7.75% is boring
  • gross expense ratio of 1.59% is relatively high even for an international fund, and
  • I decided to switch to a more value-focused ETF fund.

What's interesting is that the shares are now worth a cool $8,580. This is in spite of the fact that I never actively bought additional shares of the fund-- I stopped contributing to my traditional IRA in favor of a ROTH IRA.

The number of shares that I own grew over the years from about 150 to 396 shares when I sold it. Thanks to automatic dividend reinvestment!

That said, you're probably wondering what on earth does the selling of my mutual fund have anything to do with buying a 65" TV ??

Nothing really... so go ahead, buy that $1,699.99 TV on Best Buy.

But I hope this post gave you an idea how much the purchase will really cost you in the long run.

Saturday, January 14, 2017

Why you should save for your kids' college education

One of the financial concerns of every couple is saving for their kid's college education. Some end up making excuses why they shouldn't, among them:
  • You cannot borrow for retirement, but you can borrow for college.
  • It promotes responsibility-- they'll work harder academically.
  • I don't have much money left after expenses.
Should parents save for college? You're going to hear a strong opinion from me...

My kids playing with the next door neighbor when they were younger.

Top excuses parents make

"You cannot borrow for retirement, but you can borrow for college."

It's true that you should prioritize your retirement; the kids can always borrow. But do you really want your kids to get into debt??? I don't and I'll do my darn best to help them pay for their education. Don't be selfish.

Assuming that you're debt free (besides the house), you should contribute the bulk of your savings into your retirement account AND still make an effort to save some for college. I'm not saying that you should be responsible for 100% of the costs but at least make some effort.

Times are different, the cost of education is getting higher than ever. Your kids will need as much help from you as possible. You brought them into this world, so you bear some responsibility in making sure that they have a bright future.

"It promotes responsibility-- they'll work harder academically."

Children learn from their parents. They are an extension of their parents by their words, thoughts, and actions. How then can not saving for college promote responsibility??

In fact, it might have the opposite effect-- it can promote your irresponsibility.

Would they work harder academically if they're paying for it themselves? Probably yes. Does this mean that they'll perform better than when you're paying for it? No.

By saving for college, you instill in them the responsibility to do the same for your grandchildren and the generations to come.

"I don't have much money left after expenses."

Unfortunately, the people who make these excuses are the same people who overspend on things like cars, vacations, and mindless home renovations.

In most cases, all you need to do is to tighten your budget. There are countless of ways you can save extra money:

driving a cheaper car, changing your own oil,  shopping for cheaper insurance, avoiding junk food, brown-bagging your lunch, getting rid of the cable, buying food in bulk, taking advantage of coupons, avoiding overdraft fees, not paying ATM fees, not buying extended warranties, buying refurbish electronics, skipping the latest model, mowing your own lawn... whew!

Either that or get a second job.

You should and you should start before they're born!

The problem is that parents start saving 2 or 3 years before their children go to college when time is not on their side.

Just like your retirement savings, the earlier you start, the more time your investment will grow. This is especially true if the funds are invested in stocks.

In my case, I started a 529 account for each of my kids as soon my wife told me that she's pregnant. As a result, we now have over $100,000 saved for my 2 children.

The results speak for themselves.

Savings for Madeline (8 years before college)

Savings for Marco (11 years before college)